blog.adambabcock 1G digital native / educator from around Chicago / edtech enthusiast / world traveler / food lover / learning from others through my PLN

12Dec/11

structured group time + authentic audience = spawn of impromptu student debates

I've got over 30 recorded minutes of an un-prompted, un-facilitated (probably more like 45+ minute) student debate that spawned out of my classroom today.  I only interacted to wave at a voice recorder that I set down at the table.  I noticed that something had started as one group turned around to talk to another about their competing solutions to a problem we posed in our latest project.  (This past month, students are driven by the question: In light of the pressing financial burden of running our government as-is, how can we as political advisers effectively eliminate one branch of the United States government but still run efficiently as a country?)  As two students (who are known for their opinions and leadership in our class) picked apart each other's arguments for their solutions, one table turned around... then another walked over... then the class clown(s) noticed and wanted to get a piece of it... and soon we had most of the class circling around this debate that no one prompted... except the students themselves.

What's impressive is that much of the debate was self-sustained by the students themselves.  They policed to keep the clowns from interrupting the dialogue.  They even stopped to set protocols and try to salvage the debate when tones got testy; interruptions showed rudeness; or listening was not its finest.  I was proud.  They should be proud, too.

This comes after the heat was turned up under their feet.  As a PBL facilitator, what good would our project be if we didn't bring in some real-world experts, right?  Well, upon the announcement that our state representative and a city alderman would be on the panel of presentation judges/evaluators, I saw a renewed interest in the project as a whole.

What should we wear in front of them?

Will we have to answer questions from them?

What kinds of questions will they ask?

Is he gonna be mad if we get rid of [the equivalent of] his job?

Talk about authenticity.  Well, rigor, too.  I don't think I could have motivated/dragged them along to ask the last few, even if I put on a song and dance routine.  Not with graphic organizers.  Not with deadlines.  Not with grades.  What I saw today was personal investment because my students asked themselves, "Who am I going to impress tomorrow with my education?"  There was quite an energy today in finding out a new, expert audience will be a part of the evaluation process.

Students scrambled to make impressive PowerPoints, get my feedback or practice their timing and transitions between speakers.  It was a good day and one which I could never have predicted to show itself on a Monday.  With finals coming up -- when all school seems to be winding down and holiday excitement winding the kids up -- I'm glad to see that our group of sophomores is finally "getting" what New Tech is supposed to be all about.  Now, let's see what they've got tomorrow.

Share
24Jun/10

Teaching Inference: literary inferences

My incoming freshmen just couldn't seem to get the idea of inferring a literary reference until I let slip some lyrics about shooting stars in a last ditch effort at making them understand the reference...  I think we were pretty close to all breaking into song and I lost quite a lot of credibility.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsQ0WCLUXy8

fail

Share
18Jun/10

TGIF: what went right about the schoolday

Text: Fever 1793

Some small behavioral worries aside, I am very happy with the way my students worked together today.  I tried a modified version of lit circles today in class.  I needed to get through four chapters of reading today to remain on-track with my novel completion goals.  Here's how it worked... very well.

We read as a class, but pairs of students had tasks to complete:

  • 3 volunteer narrators (one per chapter who received a smidgen of extra credit for being the first volunteers)
  • 1 "voices" Impersonator for the characters' dialog
  • 2-3 Study Guide Scouts ("Look ahead at the questions, and note the pages where the answers are as we read...")
  • 2 Vocab Alarms ("Using the 'Vocab in Context' worksheet that we completed before the reading, alarm us when we see the word used, so we can mark the page to get more context.)
  • 2-3 Prediction Monitors who will respond to the class predictions when we make reading stops
  • 2 pairs of  Theme Trackers (4 students) who note the page numbers and references as to when a theme or related words pop up in the text.  In our book's case, tracking Freedom and Sickness.  These students will keep the class Theme Log and also be offered EC if they type up the document and email it to me.

Some other tasks I am considering:

  • 2-3 Background Knowledge Experts to reference when we see things that popped up in our summaries of the historical Appendix
  • 2 Character stalkers to focus on how a character develops traits over time
  • 2 Questioners to ask questions as we go

Our Impersonator was identified by an early survey of random skills that I had students write down on their Contact Cards.  He loved the job, and seems to have really propelled students into the text by providing some comic relief.

On a side note: students were aghast at the concept of blood-letting.  The discussion came up after an activity we did using the historical Appendix, but elaboration today took us 10 minutes into a discussion of what medicine used to be...  I need to find an article to practice summarizing that type of information.

Share
7May/09

Thank you, student

I was told today (the day before my last) that I will make a great teacher because I never get walked over even though I listen to students.  The listening was the biggest part.  The student really pushed to convince me of this and did not let me quietly accept the compliment.  Great way to settle the semester.

Share
Plugin from the creators of Brindes :: More at Plulz Wordpress Plugins